U.S. Citizens Only Need Weapons For Hunting Or Defense Of Household

Letters to the Editor: weapons, 2nd amendmentIn response to the articles covering the recent shooting in Las Vegas.

To The Editor:

The second amendment of the United States Constitution states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Obviously the need for a state militia has been replaced by the National Guard and Coast Guard whereby trained military personnel are entrusted with the defense of this country against domestic enemies. Their weapons are tightly controlled and safeguarded.

The only two reasons for a citizen to own a firearm are for hunting or defense of the household from intruders. In either case, ownership of a handgun, shotgun or rifle is more than adequate to satisfy these purposes. There is absolutely no need for any U.S. civilian to own any weapon more powerful or sophisticated than these.

Accordingly, all handguns, shotguns and rifles must be licensed and registered to the degree necessary to match weapon to owner at the click of a computer key. Furthermore, we must guarantee that the mentally ill do not gain access to them under any circumstances. Finally, if we had prohibited the purchase of more sophisticated weapons several innocent victims would not have died or been harmed at shopping malls, college campuses, Congressional meetings, churches, and now concerts. We as a country must deal with this issue immediately lest our society fall back to the days when everyone carried a holster.

Joe Bialek
Cleveland, OH

eNews Park Forest welcomes letters to the editor on any subject. Letters may be sent to letters@enewspf.com, or to eNews Park Forest Editor, 20 Ash Street, Park Forest, IL, 60466. Please include your name, home town, and a phone number for verification purposes for consideration of publication.