WASHINGTON, DC –(ENEWSPF)—February 5, 2015. Today, Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone Jr., Commerce Manufacturing & Trade Subcommittee Ranking Member Jan Schakowsky, and Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee Ranking Member Diana DeGette sent a letter to Chairmen Fred Upton, Michael Burgess, and Tim Murphy requesting hearings on the rise in subprime auto loans to low-income consumers.
Over the past five years, the dollar value of new subprime loans has doubled. Those loans are offered at very high interest rates to low-income borrowers, some of whom have no source of income and are at almost immediate risk of delinquency and default. The securitization of those loans – repackaging them into bonds that are bought and sold by everyone from individual investors to pension funds to insurance companies – spreads the risk of those bad lending practices from individual borrowers to the entire economy. This rise in subprime loans is frighteningly similar to the rise in subprime mortgages that preceded the housing collapse in 2008.
Unlike real estate, auto lenders are utilizing new technologies to pressure delinquent borrowers and to repossess their cars. Increasingly, starter interrupt devices – which allow lenders to use GPS to track a vehicle’s whereabouts and disable a vehicle remotely – have been used in association with subprime loans. GPS technology in these devices has allowed lenders to follow the movements of subprime borrowers. Ignitions have been turned off at stoplights, gas stations, and even on highways. Those activities present serious privacy and safety concerns.
The members urged a prompt hearing at the Energy and Commerce Committee, which they argue is well-suited to address this growing issue. “With jurisdiction over the relevant agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,” the members wrote, “we can ensure that action is taken to protect the public from unscrupulous vehicle financing practices. In addition, we can ensure the safety of the driving public and others that share our roads is appropriately considered.”
For the full text of the letter see below.
February 5, 2015The Honorable Fred Upton Chairman Committee on Energy and Commerce 2125 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
The Honorable Michael C. Burgess Chairman Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade 2125 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable Tim Murphy Chairman Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations 2125 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Chairman Upton, Chairman Burgess, and Chairman Murphy:
We are writing to request that the Energy and Commerce Committee hold hearings to examine the rise in the issuance of subprime auto loans to low-income consumers.
These hearings should focus on whether subprime auto lenders are creating loan terms that deceptively, unfairly, or abusively exploit Americans who cannot afford, and may not even fully comprehend the terms of, such loans. In addition, we should examine increasingly common requirements that purchasers’ cars be outfitted with starter interrupt devices, which allow lenders to remotely disable ignitions. A Committee hearing would give members a better understanding of these developments and an opportunity to assess the need for appropriate legislation.
Subprime loans are defined as those loans issued to borrowers that have credit scores at or below 620-640, out of a maximum of 850. These loans can be issued for amounts that are twice the value of the cars purchased, with a total cost – including interest rates – that can more than triple the true value. Today, 25 percent of new auto loans are considered subprime, up from 15 percent in 2009. In the second quarter of 2014, lenders issued $20.6 billion worth of subprime auto loans, which is a doubling of subprime loan volume since the same quarter in 2010.
While it is vitally important that people who need a car are able to acquire a loan, interest rates charged on many subprime auto loans could be considered usurious – in some cases, annual rates exceed 29 percent. Those rates – and the inability of some borrowers to repay their loans – have put more and more drivers at risk of defaulting on their loans and losing their cars to repossession. There was an increase in delinquencies within 60 days of loan issuance of more than eight percent from the third quarter of 2013 to the third quarter of 2014.
First, the Committee should explore investor demand in subprime auto loan securities. The packaging of subprime auto loans into securities has increased significantly in recent years – rising more than 300 percent since 2010. Those securitizations – in which lenders pool thousands of these loans into bonds that are sold to mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds, and insurance companies – could threaten every area of our economy, much like the mortgage-backed securities that led to the Great Recession.
To keep up with investor demand, lenders are extending their reach to more credit-challenged borrowers. This leads to some lenders lengthening the duration of their loans. Stretching out the repayment period of loans increases the total cost to consumers. Twenty-five percent of new car loans in the months of October and November 2014 were 73 to 84 months-long, and 40 percent of new car loans were between 61 and 72 months-long.
Second, we should examine why borrowers are getting loans they cannot afford. An investigative report in the New York Times detailed how some auto dealers are fueling the crisis by falsifying loan applications with inaccurate income or employment information. Auto dealers who falsify documents make considerable profits on the sale of vehicles, but bad actors don’t stop there. The difference between the interest rate the lender is charging and the rate the consumer ends up paying is pure profit to the auto dealer.
Third, we should scrutinize the increase in lenders using cars as collateral. We are seeing an increase in “title loan” storefronts in disadvantaged and underbanked communities. These title loans often have interest rates from 80 percent to over 500 percent, and are not issued based on a borrower’s ability to repay. The results have been devastating, with repossessions on one in six title loans.
The rise in subprime auto loans has coincided with a similar increase in repossessions. In the first quarter of 2014, repossessions increased 78 percent from the first quarter of 2013. After repossession, consumers are left with car debt but without access to the transportation they need to get to work to earn the money needed to repay their debt. This vicious debt cycle can propel borrowers into bankruptcy.
Fourth, we should go beyond the direct issue of auto lending practices and investigate the usage of starter interrupt devices by subprime lenders, which presents a serious privacy and safety concern. These devices – which allow lenders to use GPS to track a vehicle’s whereabouts and disable a vehicle remotely – are now installed in an estimated one in four vehicles that are subject to subprime loans.
Lenders are using this technology to locate and quickly repossess cars or alternatively, shut the cars down, which has been termed “electronic repossession.” Consumers have not been just stranded at home, they have reported being left without transportation at work or at a gas station.
Even more troubling, the potential of these devices to disable vehicles while they are operating presents a serious safety issue for everyone on our roads. Consumers have explained that their cars were turned off while idling at stoplights, in dangerous neighborhoods, and even while driving on the highway.
Some borrowers also have been “geo-fenced,” alerting lenders whenever the borrowers are not traveling within their normal routine to and from work. One consumer reported being tracked to a domestic violence shelter. All Americans are entitled a right to privacy, but borrowers with low credit scores are often left with an impossible choice: sacrifice their right to privacy or their access to a vehicle.
The Energy and Commerce Committee is ideally situated to carry out such an examination. With jurisdiction over the relevant agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, we can ensure that action is taken to protect the public from unscrupulous vehicle financing practices. In addition, we can ensure the safety of the driving public and others that share our roads is appropriately considered.
Charging low-income borrowers burdensome – and perhaps ultimately unpayable – interest rates for vitally necessary goods must be stopped. Likewise, Americans of all economic backgrounds expect and deserve a right to privacy and safety in their car. While cars are essential to livelihood, consumers must be protected against these harmful practices.
For these reasons, we respectfully ask that you schedule hearings on subprime auto lending as soon as reasonably possible.
Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky
Rep. Diana DeGette