38 F
Park Forest
Wednesday, December 7, 2022
The Free Press Isn't Free. Like what you see? Please subscribe.

Attorney General Madigan Files Brief Opposing Employment Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation

human rights
(Source: aclu.org)

Madigan Leads Coalition Urging Federal Appellate Court to Declare Workplace Sexual Orientation Discrimination Illegal under Federal Law

Chicago —(ENEWSPF)—March 15, 2018

By: Rosemary Piser

Attorney General Lisa Madigan yesterday led a coalition of 16 Attorneys General in filing an amicus brief arguing that employment discrimination based on sexual orientation violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In the brief filed with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Horton v. Midwest Geriatric Management, LLC, the Attorneys General urged the court to join a growing number of federal appellate courts in recognizing that Title VII’s workplace protections extend to sexual orientation.

Recent federal appellate court decisions have held that Title VII bans sexual orientation discrimination based on the plain wording of the statute, decades of U.S. Supreme Court precedent and common sense. Since not all states have enacted laws outlawing sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace, the coalition stressed that the Title VII protections are critically important.

Attorney General Madigan said, “While employment discrimination based on sexual orientation is illegal in Illinois and many other states, Title VII plays a critical role in states without this protection. By recognizing that Title VII bans sexual orientation discrimination, the courts can ensure that individuals in every state are protected from the harm caused by this form of discrimination.”

In part, the brief states:

“In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court held that an anti-miscegenation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, concluding that the State of Virginia could not prohibit marriages on the basis of a racial classification. Here, as in Loving, Horton alleges that he was subjected to discrimination based on his association with a member of a protected class, except that sex, rather than race, is the protected class at issue. In other words, treating a man who loves a man worse than a man who loves a woman is a form of sex discrimination.”

Madigan and the other Attorneys General also urged the Eighth Circuit to recognize that sexual orientation discrimination amounts to discrimination based on an employee’s failure to conform to sexual stereotypes associated with their group.

Joining Madigan in filing the brief were the Attorneys General of California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia and Washington.

A copy of the brief can be found here.

Source: www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov


Recent Articles

Stay Connected


Local Advertisers



Park Forest
38 ° F
41.6 °
34.8 °
93 %
100 %
46 °
42 °
39 °
41 °
44 °

About Google Ads

The Google-supplied ads that appear on this website are not reviewed ahead of time and differ for each visitor. If anything offensive, inappropriate, or otherwise unwholesome appears, please notify us so we can take steps to block that specific advertiser. Email the URL or advertiser name to [email protected].