UK—(ENEWSPF)—19 December 2013. Video and computer games have seen a huge rise in popularity worldwide. The fact that such games provide an immersive virtual experience has led to public concerns, often articulated in the media, about a possible link between gaming and real world aggression. However, a new study by the Oxford Internet Institute at Oxford University has found that although the general population has a diverse set of attitudes towards gaming, our belief in whether there is a link between video and computer games, and aggressive behaviour is often influenced by whether we have actual experience of gaming.
The study found that men who never or almost never played electronic games were three and a half times more likely to believe that a link between gaming and real world aggression existed, as compared with men who said they played video/computer games most days. Younger men, aged 18-24, were almost six times more likely than the older men (65 and over) to have concrete gaming experience.
In March this year, a total of 2,504 people, who were representative of the US population, were surveyed on how regularly they played video/computer games. Some participants were also asked to rate how much they agreed with the statement: ‘Violent video/computer games cause real-life aggression’.
Overall, women were found to be almost twice as likely as men of all ages to believe gaming contributed to real world aggression. There were no demographic differences for the group that neither agreed nor disagreed with a gaming-aggressive link.
The study says that as yet there is no scientific agreement on whether electronic games can cause harmful behaviour or not. Yet it says the public debate on this topic has attracted growing interest, with concerns heightened after events such as mass shootings. As the number of people who take up gaming is on the increase yearly, the researcher suggests that the effects of games are likely to become even more of a focus for future research as the medium becomes ever more ubiquitous.
Study author Dr Andrew Przybylski, from the Oxford Internet Institute, said: ‘Whether electronic games are a good thing or a bad thing remains an open question, but it is a topic that stirs up strong views. Older men without gaming experience were the most concerned about online games being linked to aggressive behaviour. The debate swings the other way when younger men with gaming experience are asked the same question. Overall women were less likely to believe there was a gaming-aggressive link than older men.
‘At present, the spotlight is on electronic games in popular, legislative and scientific debates. This study is the first step towards understanding a wider aspect of that conversation. As the average age of online gamers continues to rise, this study suggests that the public debate around electronic games may become less polarised. History tells us that there have been other examples where novel forms of entertainment have met with social concern about their negative effect on society as a whole.’
In the study, Dr Przybylski cites previous studies that support his findings. In research by Ivory and Kalyanaraman, participants were instructed to think about a specific violent video game they were familiar with. The study found that by reflecting on the specific features of a particular game, the study participants were less likely to believe the game promoted aggression. Another study by Harris Interactive showed that nearly three-quarters of older Americans endorsed a belief that there was a link between playing violent games and teenagers showing violent behaviour, whereas less than half of younger adults said they thought violent games led teenagers to behave aggressively.
Notes:
‘Who believes electronic games cause real world aggression?’ by Andrew K Przybylski is published in the journal, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. See full paper at :http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cyber.2013.0245
-
- Background: Forbes article on research into link between violence and video/computer games:
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelvenables/2013/10/02/why-two-hundred-twenty-eight-scholars-cautioned-american-psychological-association/
The Oxford Internet Institute (OII) was founded as a department of the University of Oxford in 2001. The OII is a leading world centre for the multidisciplinary study of the Internet and society, focusing on Internet-related research and teaching, and on informing policy-making and practice. The OII’s research faculty, academic visitors and research associates are engaged in a variety of research projects covering social, economic, political, legal, industrial, technical and ethical issues of the Internet in everyday life, governance and democracy, science and learning, and shaping the Internet. See http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk
About Dr Andrew Przybylski
Andrew Przybylski is based at the Oxford Internet Institute (OII). Since 2005 his research has focused on applying motivational theory to understand the universal aspects of video games and social media that draw people in, the role of game structure and content on human aggression, and the factors that lead to successful versus unsuccessful self-regulation of gaming contexts and social media use. See: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=328
Source: ox.ac.uk
